Papers with multi-agent baselines
DART: Leveraging Multi-Agent Disagreement for Tool Recruitment in Multimodal Reasoning (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Nithin Sivakumaran, Justin Chen, David Wan, Yue Zhang, Jaehong Yoon, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal
| Challenge: | a key strength of human intelligence is the ability to debate and discuss reasoning with others. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent framework that uses disagreements between visual agents to identify useful visual tools that can resolve inter-agency disagreement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework beats the strongest baseline on A-OKVQA and MMMU, respectively. |
ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMs (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle with natural language reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-model multi-agent framework that enhances collaborative reasoning between LLM agents via multiple rounds of discussion. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on seven benchmarks show that ReConcile significantly improves LLM reasoning on individual and team levels. |
Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Textual Backpropagation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaowen Ma, Yunpu Ma, Chenyang Lin, Sikuan Yan, Jinhe Bi, Zixuan Cao, Yijun Tian, Volker Tresp, Hinrich Schuetze
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven effective for addressing complex, high-dimensional tasks, but current approaches rely on static, manually engineered multi-agent configurations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that conceptualizes multi-agent collaboration as a layered neural network architecture. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses leading multi-agent baselines under the same configurations, showing consistent performance improvements. |
Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with complex reasoning tasks due to the vast reasoning space inherent in the complexity and inherent ambiguities of natural languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a mixture-of-search-agents paradigm that integrates diverse reasoning pathways by combining independent exploration and iterative refinement among multiple LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves performance over single-agent and multi-agend baselines in complex mathematical and commonsense reasoning tasks. |